By Kirk LeCureux
Michael McCann, a Mississippi College School of Law Professor and contributing writer for the
Sports Law Blog, has offered us an
interesting question.Will rugby be sufficiently "American" for the American consumer?Mr. McCann’s question is certainly an intriguing one to consider. As USAR prepares its vision and strategic plan for rugby’s growth here in America, have they considered that rugby might be deemed too foreign for American consumers? Although the MLS has seen moderate success, it does not attract crowds or generate revenues that have even approached those of more popular American sports such as MLB, NFL, and NBA. Mr. McCann speculates that at least part of the reason for this disparity can be explained due to cultural differences. Could soccer, and subsequently rugby, just “seem” too foreign for the American consumer?
First, let’s take a quick look at some of the other professional team sports here in the United States that have achieved a fairly high level of success.
Baseball – Usually considered America’s past time, watching baseball gives me an overwhelming urge to eat apple pie and grill some hot dogs. This sport isn’t one of my personal favorites, but the interest level in baseball remains high through strikes and steroid scandal. Despite the fact that American consumers are demanding faster, more, and better, the leisurely pace of baseball seems to be carrying the sport along just fine. Moreover, baseball is still probably the sport most closely associated with Americanism despite the fact that its players are increasingly coming from other countries.
Basketball – another native sport of North America, basketball supposedly saw a decline in ratings after stars like Larry Bird, Magic Johnson, and Michael Jordan called it quits, but salaries are still rising and new stadiums are more expensive. I doubt every owner is taking a loss so the health of the NBA seems pretty good to me. Additionally, with the rising status of foreign born players like Yao Ming and Manu Ginobili, international interest has been growing faster than American suburbia’s urge to change the channel to something else (note: the league does seem to have rebounded a bit from the US television ratings slide that occurred during the post-Jordan and pre-Lebron years). The fast pace of basketball appeals to both kids and young adults, as well as the older generation who has been watching basketball since the days of Dr. J and the ABA. Basketball might not be the first thought that pops in your head when you think of American sports, but it has certainly become one of America’s leading athletic past-times.
Football – ah yes, the current king of American professional sports. No surprise that American Football was also invented here in the United States. It’s also no surprise that football features fast paced action, exciting collisions, and consistently amazing displays of athleticism. The Super Bowl is practically a national holiday! American Football was indeed originated here in the US, but was actually based off of Rugby Union’s sister sport, Rugby League. Football can attribute a lot of its success to the fact that it has been very well marketed over the years through primetime’s Monday Night Football, ESPN’s Sunday night games, and even the occasional Thursday night thriller.
NASCAR – what happens when you take a good ole boy, put him into a domestic sedan on steroids, and tell him to drive faster than everybody else on the track for a few hundred miles? You got NASCAR! Just thinking about NASCAR makes me want to make a trip to KFC and speed the entire way there. But NASCAR isn’t all about rednecks and race tracks, by restructuring its marketing and corporate sponsorship plans in the 1970’s, this spectacle has gone from being a regional attraction to becoming the second most watched sport in the US in the span of about thirty years. I hope you’ve been paying attention USA Rugby. And yes, NASCAR is a team sport. Ask any race fan how important the pit crew is to the success of a race team and he’ll agree with me.
Ice Hockey – hockey saw a considerable increase in popularity only to have its bubble burst leading to a lockout and lost season. The NHL has a very strong international presence with players from Canada, Russia, Sweden, Finland, Eastern Europe, and basically anywhere else where it’s cold. While guys like Peter Forsberg might not get the same kind of endorsements that American hockey stars like Keith Tkachuck or even Canadian stars like Wayne Gretzky have pulled in, the league as a whole has seen success despite the fact that its more of a Canadian (i.e. foreign) sport.
Soccer – clearly this is the most foreign of all the professional American sports. It is also the least popular. Don’t fret soccer fans, MLS is only a little more than a decade old and the sport as a whole is still maturing. As long as the entities behind US Soccer don’t feel like they’ve arrived, they can continue to grow the sport through youth development. Although professional soccer isn’t extremely popular now, you have to wonder how many fans it will attract as the children of today’s soccer moms grow up playing soccer. It will also be interesting to see how the increasing globalization of our world affects the interests of American sports fans. Don’t forget that soccer is by far the most popular sport in the world. On the other hand, it’s difficult to capture the action of a soccer match on television so someone will have to figure out the best way to reach the mass market.
AnalysisSo how does rugby compare? Well obviously we don’t compare yet as a professional entity. At a minimum, we’re probably a few years away from even hoping to be close to what American Soccer has accomplished over the last few decades.
But how do we compare as a sport in general? Rugby is most similar to football. Like football, rugby features “did-you-see-that?!” collisions and athletic runs and ball-handling.
Should rugby attempt to compete with football? Absolutely not! That’s a suicide mission in today’s market for any professional sports league. Instead, rugby should focus on marketing 1) the similarities between football and rugby and 2) the inherent advantages that rugby has over football as a spectator sport.
Inherent advantages you ask? Over American Football?! Yes, that’s what I said. First, rugby shines where other sports fall short in terms of pace. Without consistent stoppages of play, rugby could have considerable appeal to what I call the never-stop-moving generation. For those of you that haven’t watched a rugby match, a tackle does not result in a stoppage of play, huddle, reformation, and snap. Instead, a ruck generally forms over the ball in which the players essentially “fight” for the next possession. Usually, the team with the player being tackled is at an advantage and maintains possession of the ball. Only hockey and soccer can compare to rugby’s fast pace.
Secondly, a rugby player in shorts and a jersey is much easier to humanize than a football player shrouded in plastic and spandex. This advantage would bring the potential for stronger player recognition than what football or even hockey could offer.
I don’t look at American Soccer’s case as a failure in professional sports. For the most part, MLS has been financially viable despite the fact that a large percentage of Americans aren’t all that familiar with it. The lack of immediate large-scale acceptance, in my opinion, is more due to the fact that non-soccer players haven’t grown up around soccer and just don’t really “get it.” Scores are low and most Americans don’t understand the action that is taking place in between the goals to set up a shot. I think adoption of MLS has been slow because soccer is different and unfamiliar to consumers, not because it’s culturally foreign.
In its adoption phase, rugby will have an advantage over soccer for a couple of reasons. First, matches are high scoring. Secondly, Americans have fallen in love with physical contact and big hits which rugby can deliver in droves. Third, even if the spectator doesn’t entirely understand the rules, rugby is still fairly easy to follow. Like football, the objective is simple; its good to advance the ball towards your goal, score points, possess the ball on offense, and hit the opposing players hard on defense. Because rugby is less different than soccer and very similar to our current king of professional sports-football-I believe fans will adopt rugby as a common spectator sport much more quickly than they’ve accepted soccer.
Even though adoption has been slow for professional soccer in the United States, the ultimate fate of the concept won’t be determined for another generation, which is when the youth players of the last decade or two will decide whether to follow soccer as a professional sport in adulthood or abandon it for another sport like American Football. Similarly, even if rugby can form a profitable professional league in the short-term, its long-term success can’t be predicted until we can gauge the impact of today’s youth rugby development.